The bucket!" We kept asking ourselves why a teacher can lose his job if he insults young people in the way that Bieter Bohlen has done with his fecal rhetoric. The juror got off scot-free time and time again. I was surprised that many journalists in recent reports did not differentiate enough. For example, we read in the press about a "muzzle" - to "swear". But the fact that the point is that Bohlen is no longer allowed to bully young people in the future was often ignored.
The long overdue rules have nothing to uae rcs data do with "banning speech". Dieter Bohlen, who has so far been able to simply ignore all complaints and always buy his way out, does not want to know anything about the new rules. The criteria set out are unrealistic for him. Fecal language is common today. Dieter Bohlen does not want to do without sayings like: "For me, such noises come from other openings."
He threatened to quit. Back to Mark Twain: Speaking plainly, swearing, criticizing is not the same as insulting young people and humiliating and destroying candidates. If Bohlen does not want to see this difference and apparently lacks the understanding that in future one should no longer speak in a contemptuous manner at casting shows, then he can easily take a back seat as a juror. His resignation would be a gain.