As long as there are free alternatives, this remains an extremely risky undertaking. But even here there are other technical pitfalls. At the industry leader, the New York Times, for example, it's quite easy to consume for free by turning off cookies.
This also puts the providers' second potential taiwan rcs data new source of income at great risk. So the firewall has to be raised even higher. It seems like a curse. Everything the publishers touch is disenchanted in an instant. Every new initiative to monetize their journalistic content meets with unexpected resistance. And that's why it's not just about the future of print, as is widely spread as "conventional wisdom". The problem is much more fundamental.
It is a show. Period. The idea of using a news presenter is a step in the wrong direction. What is needed are not in-depth and critical interviews, but other qualities. This discrepancy was made obvious by the comparison between Christa Rigozzi and Sven Epiney on the one hand and Susanne Wille on the other. Swisslos' strong advertising presence is evident because the show is primarily financed in this way - something that would not even be possible in Germany for private broadcasters, who have been banned from such shows by the state media authorities. And since the drawing of the winning numbers is always dramaturgically pointless because the cheering winners remain invisible, one would have to try to shorten this part. The mere presence of potential millionaires offers a lot of excitement and entertainment and fits into a show. I know that none of this is my business. And I promise I will try to improve. That means, until next time.