This extraordinary situation naturally has a direct impact on finances. At Sat.1, I earned around 500,000 euros a year. In return, I was in a hot seat from which I could be kicked out at any time if I performed poorly - like all my predecessors. But my most important station faces earned more, much more, and this for a manageable romania rcs data number of programs a year. So I signed several contracts worth millions because that was the only way I could secure the station's most important asset - my ratings guarantors.
At the SRG, you can avoid all of this. And that's why it's not the stars in Leutschenbach who make the most money, but the bosses, the top members of the nomenklatura. In this sense, too, the SRG is unique, even if the top salaries are in a very manageable range. When Roger de Weck repeatedly tries to compare the costs of foreign broadcasters to underline the extraordinary efficiency of the SRG, he could add: And look at how cheaply we buy not only our sports and film rights, but also our TV stars. No one can do that. We are clearly the best in Europe in this respect!
The attack on the SRG will continue. Not in the program discussion, the famous public service, but where it really hurts: in financing, the amount of license fee money and the further expansion strategy. being prepared. In the age of advancing digitization, the free culture and the tough competition between the individual media companies, these proposals will fall on fertile ground.