The audience deserves to be classified so that they can form their own opinion. survey make sense. Not the other way around. Otherwise, what is packaged as a turn to the audience and an ear to the pulse of the people is in reality a disregard for the audience, which has not been properly informed but is being used indirectly to lebanon rcs data confirm an editor's opinion. This is simply populist journalism that tells the audience what they want to hear and at the same time leads them by the nose.
In order to be factually accurate, it is important to show that the issue was about Section 103 of the Criminal Code, which, when a foreign head of state feels insulted, gives the government the task of deciding whether the judiciary should take up the matter. Next, a public prosecutor must decide whether to bring charges at all; if he does so, a court must decide whether Böhmermann should be convicted in this matter at all. The section describes a special rule, in addition to which there is also a rule in the Code of Criminal Procedure that anyone who feels insulted can apply for a procedure through which an offender could be convicted under Section 185 of the Criminal Code.