If in future only those media that adhere to the migration pact will be able to benefit from funding, this will be a serious infringement on media pluralism. Media content must not be controlled. Neither by politicians nor by interest groups. Anyone who tells the media how to write about a certain topic is actually endangering democracy and south korea rcs data freedom of expression. Journalists must not be muzzled when there are grievances - including migration. Journalism should not be comfortable. Providing responsible information does not mean deliberately ignoring negative aspects. Media consumers usually recognize very quickly when facts are deliberately omitted or glossed over.
It also helps to take a look at yourself. For example: over 70 percent of those I follow on Twitter are men. it works today on the podiums. Because appropriate representation of women is a given for me. And it works elsewhere too. I have even been on an all-female panel on a tech topic. And as always when women are in the majority, I was pleasantly surprised that I was able to finish the first sentence without anyone interrupting me.
Journalists and politicians often believe that a discussion without fuss, shouting and confrontation is boring. But women in particular - whether on the podium or in the audience - are often put off by this. It is right that the "Club" editorial team is thinking about the proportion of women. It would be even better if they set a target. An average of 35 percent instead of 25 percent would be feasible. But that means that an unknown or unconventional woman will also get to appear. A risk, perhaps. But one thing is clear: competence will certainly not suffer.