it is clear that the customs union

[rifat28dddd]

If we consider the second trend of price growth on the part of Kazakhstani producers, then, on the contrary, it has a positive character for them. Some of our goods are cheaper than Russian ones, which means that our producers have a real competitive advantage over Russian or Belarusian ones. Here again,

provides advantages for local producers, when Russian buyers can buy most of their products. I think no one will argue that such an expansion of sales opportunities is very profitable for sellers. On the other hand, local consumers suffer from this, since the law of supply and demand equalizes our prices with Russian ones.

Therefore, it cannot be said that such alignment is an absolute evil ukraine cell phone number list for Kazakhstan, producers win, consumers suffer. In general, public statements on this issue look illogical, on the one hand, they care about the problems of our producers, that they suffer from the creation of the CU, but as soon as some local players, in accordance with the law of supply and demand, equalize (in this case, increase) their prices, go to new Russian buyers, and thereby win, everyone begins to swear and be indignant about such a situation.

We must be completely honest, if we want to support our producers, then we need to create conditions for them when they can receive sufficient profit for development, and this means being ready to buy lower-quality Kazakh goods at higher prices and give them the opportunity to earn money by selling goods to Russia (and thereby reduce the domestic supply of goods, which causes an increase in domestic prices).