According to the type of power, leaders are divided as follows:
Master
He doesn't care that serfdom was abolished long ago. He treats any worker as a dependent being who has no rights, and he doesn't recognize any other relationships.
The main principle of the master's work: if I taiwan mobile phone number example want I will punish, if I want I will pardon, in any case I will do with you what I want. When working with a master, you can forget about the compliance of relations with job descriptions, the organization and labor legislation, all attempts to build equal cooperation based on understanding and respect have no result.
A leader of this type, like a gentleman, in his classical understanding, necessarily has lordly habits. For example, he regularly delays the payment of wages, which are mostly paid "under the table", and he does not pay everything at once, but divides it into small parts.
Employees have to carry out any orders from their superiors, regardless of whether it is part of their job description or not. They may be ordered to wash the floor or windows, buy cigarettes for the master, wash his car, and so on.
And, of course, any serf beauty should not refuse the boss satisfaction of sexual desires, otherwise he will not be the master.
Father dear
This type of manager prefers a more humane and constructive approach to work; in his understanding, power and management consist of educating and protecting employees.
He may also have lordly manners, but with a patronizing tinge. Patronage is precisely his distinctive feature. Such a boss will always promote the professional development of subordinates and defend their interests before the top management.
He does not spare time for teachings and instructions, and at the same time he can easily, in a purely fatherly way, raise his voice to an employee. In other circumstances, he could have been successful in the role of an army officer ("batyani" - battalion commander) or a school teacher.
One of our own
Such a leader never sought power and got to his post more by chance than on his own initiative.
He is an excellent professional, the most qualified employee in the entire team. His relations with ordinary workers do not depend on his managerial status. In fact, he carries out scientific or technological management, while missing the disciplinary and other aspects of the process.
One of our own
Source: shutterstock.com
You can enter such a director's office without knocking, show familiarity, pat him on the shoulder in a friendly way. But at the same time, you should remember that, despite all his democracy and denial of subordination, your guy will strictly demand the fulfillment of duties and control the result.
Manager
He is the absolute opposite of a master. Such a boss does not accept anything personal in work, he strictly observes formalization in relations with the team, for him businesslike work communication is the norm.
As a rule, managers try to communicate with the staff as little as possible in person, preferring to correspond via e-mail. They will not waste your time with conversations about personal life, lecture, or give meaningless instructions. It is very good to work with such a manager.
The manager sets specific tasks that do not go beyond the employee's duties, strictly adheres to the terms of salary payment. At the same time, unlike the master, he pays bonuses based on the achievement of certain results, and not depending on his personal desire. And the calculation of the bonus amount is always transparent.
It can be said that the manager is a biological computer, the relationship with which is built on the exchange of dry information. At the same time, if the information is entered incorrectly or with a delay, the "program" will warn about the error. When the number of errors reaches a certain level, the "program" will send the user to the exit.
For a manager, each employee is an element of the system with its own market value, independent of his personal preferences.
Case: VT-metall
Find out how we reduced the cost of attracting an application by 13 times for a metalworking company in Moscow
Find out how
Cannibal
In appearance, he may seem like a wonderful, sweet person or a leader calling his comrades to a bright world of wealth and prosperity.
A cannibal can easily win over, be charming and loved by his subordinates, but his essence does not change - he eats people. It is clear that this does not happen in the literal sense, it is just that employees for him are only production machines, workhorses and nothing else.
He tries to squeeze everything possible out of the employee, and do it as cheaply as possible, and then send him to the scrap heap, like a mechanism that has exhausted its resources.
Cannibal
Source: shutterstock.com
A manager with this type of communication is usually a talented manager and a good organizer. He carefully calculates the profitability of the business and the return of the staff and constantly decides whether it is necessary to support the workhorse with oats or whether it is time to get rid of it.
A cannibal will not increase the salary of even a very valuable employee working under a heavy load if he understands that he will not go anywhere. Such a boss can hypocritically instill in his subordinates the fear of moving to another organization and thereby keep them close to him.
Sometimes he promises long-serving workers that he will work with them until retirement, but his words should not be trusted. It is precisely when a person no longer has the opportunity to change jobs and loses the ability to adapt to another company that the cannibal may decide that he has eaten the person to the end and throw the scraps out into the street.
Ostrich
For some people, making decisions on their own is torture, and it is unclear how they get into leadership positions.
The style of such bosses in terms of solving any issues is similar to the behavior of an ostrich: when faced with any difficulties, they hide their heads in the sand, maybe everything will resolve itself. Such behavior is caused by the fear of taking responsibility. As a result, such a manager cannot say yes or no to his subordinates when they come to him for explanations, instructions, et