Which confirmed that the law enforcement officer

[roseline371274]

The plot of the case was that the mother tried to receive a lump sum payment after the death of her son, a police officer, in Kramatorsk. But the Main Directorate of the National Police refused her to receive this payment. The reason was a purely formal circumstance. In a letter to the family, the police leadership in the Donetsk region motivated its refusal to receive the intended payments by the fact that Kramatorsk was not designated as a combat zone on January 2, 2023 (the day the police officer died).

The mother decided to appeal this refusal, as she had the results of the investigation, special database died as a result of rocket fire while on duty at a checkpoint. That is, while directly performing his duties, which is recorded in the official materials.

Thus, the actions of the police leadership, which denied the mother payments for her son, can be considered nonsense. After all, all the results of examinations, including the forensic medical one, confirmed that the police officer died on the spot after receiving a mine-explosive injury during the shelling. But the family of the deceased had to defend their rights to receive payments through the court for another year, due to loose interpretations of the legislation among the leadership of the National Police.

As a result, the court of first instance concluded that the only document that has weight in this case is Order No. 168 (in the government resolution of February 28, 2022 No. 168 "Issues of certain payments to military personnel, private and command personnel, police officers and their families during martial law" (paragraph 2).